10/12/2019 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly case. It is sufficient to state that Section 66 of the Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act is not basis to hold that the NCIP has jurisdiction over a conflict between a member of an indigenous cultural communities/indigenous peoples and a non-member of the same indigenous cultural communities/indigenous peoples. ACCORDINGLY, I vote to deny the Motion for Reconsideration. [1] Rep. Act No. 8371 sec. 66 provides: Section 66. Jurisdiction of the NCIP. - The NCIP, through its regional offices, shall have jurisdiction over all claims and disputes involving rights of ICCs/IPs: Provided, however, That no such dispute shall be brought to the NCIP unless the parties have exhausted all remedies provided under their customary laws. For this purpose, a certification shall be issued by the Council of Elders/Leaders who participated in the attempt to settle the dispute that the same has not been resolved, which certification shall be a condition precedent to the filing of a petition with the NCIP. [2] Ponencia, p. 9. [3] Rep. Act No. 8371, sec. 66. [4] Rep. Act No. 8369, sec. 3 provides: Section 3. Establishment of Family Courts. - There shall be established a Family Court in every province and city in the country. In case where the city is the capital of the province, the Family Court shall be established in the municipality which has the highest population. [5] Supreme Court Adm. O. No. 23-08 (2008), Designation of Special Courts to Hear, Try and Decide Environmental Cases. [6] Adm. Matter No. 03-03-03-SC, Designating Certain Branches of the Regional Trial Courts to Try and Decide Cybercrime Cases Under Republic Act No. 10175. Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/63044 32/32