e.  Moral damages     f.  Exemplary damages           3. MYRNA R. RAMONES NT$95,000.00   a.  Unexpired Portion 2,436.92   b. Salary for 4 days     c. Overtime pay for 4 hrs. in 1,523.07 4 days NT$98,960.00     PHP45,000.00 d. Refund of placement fee   16,200.00 (Less:  Amount received per Quitclaim)     e.  Moral damages     f.  Exemplary damages 25,000.00  40,000.00                        28,800.00  25,000.00  40,000.00[15]   The Labor Arbiter likewise ordered the payment of attorney’s fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the award which totaled NT$296,880.00 and P285,080.00 The other claims were dismissed for lack of merit.   Private respondents thereafter appealed the decision to the National Labor Relations Commission. The NLRC ruled that the inclusion of Alañon as party respondent in this case had no basis since respondent JIC, being a juridical person, has a legal personality, separate and distinct from its officers.[16]  It partially granted the appeal and ordered that the amounts of P15,080,P13,640 and P16,200 received under the quitclaim by Mendez, Acuña and Ramones, respectively, be deducted from their respective awards.  They were awarded attorney’s fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of their awarded labor-standards claims for unpaid wages and overtime pays.  No moral and exemplary damages and placement fees were awarded.[17]  Private respondents’ motion for partial reconsideration was denied.    On appeal, the Court of Appeals ruled for private respondents.  It set aside the resolutions dated February 26, 2002 andDecember 10, 2001 of the NLRC and dismissed the complaint of petitioners.[18]   In their petition before us, petitioners raise the following issues: I