11/9/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [51] Id. at 236-237. [52] 685 Phil. 376 [Per J. Bersamin, First Division]. [53] Id. at 397-398. [54] Rollo, p. 114. [55] Eibun-Horei-Sha, Inc., Introduction < https://www.eibun-horeisha.co.jp/english/introduction > (last visited on July 1, 2019). [56] Id. [57] US Law Library of Congress, Japan, Translation of National Legislation into English < https://www.loc.gov/law/find/pdfs/2012-007612_JP_RPT.pdf > (last visited on July 1, 2019). [58] RULES OF COURT, Rule 130, sec. 36 provides: SECTION 36. Testimony generally confined to personal knowledge; hearsay excluded. — A witness can testify only to those facts which he knows of his personal knowledge; that is, which are derived from his own perception, except as otherwise provided in these rules. [59] People v. Manhuyod, Jr., 352 Phil. 866, 880 (1998) [Per J. Davide, Jr., En Banc]. [60] See D.M. Consunji, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 409 Phil. 275 (2001) [Per J. Kapunan, First Division]. [61] People v. Estibal, 748 Phil. 850, 876 (2014) [Per J. Reyes, Third Division]. [62] RULES OF COURT, Rule 130, sec. 46 provides: SECTION 46. Learned treatises. — A published treatise, periodical or pamphlet on a subject of history, law, science or art is admissible as tending to prove the truth of a matter stated therein if the court takes judicial notice, or a witness expert in the subject testifies, that the writer of the statement in the treatise, periodical or pamphlet is recognized in his profession or calling as expert in the subject. [63] Rollo, p. 114 and 119. [64] Gatan v. Vinarao, G.R. No. 205912, October 18, 2017, 842 SCRA 602, 609 [Per J. Leonardo-De Castro, First Division]. [65] See Medina v. Koike, 791 Phil. 645 (2016) [Per J. Perlas-Bernabe, First Division]. [66] Racho v. Tanaka, G.R. No. 199515, June 25, 2018, [Per J. Leonen, Third Division]. [67] 791 Phil. 645 (2016) [Per J. Perlas-Bernabe, First Division]. https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/65383 10/11