1
crabbing opportunities in the 2018–19 crab season and future seasons. Fishermen and fishery-
2
dependent businesses, including Plaintiff, were therefore deprived of a substantial portion of their
3
annual revenue from the Dungeness crab fishery for those seasons, and many suffered additional
4
financial injuries by incurring debt to pay for operating and living expenses during the closures.
5
Fishermen and fishery-dependent businesses, including Plaintiff, will continue to suffer such
6
injuries during future domoic acid-induced fishery closures.
7
173.
Because fisheries are seasonal, fishermen often pursue multiple different fisheries
8
throughout the year. The delayed opening of the crab fishery in 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18,
9
caused many fishermen, including Plaintiff, to delay their entry into other fisheries they would
10
normally have pursued earlier, including salmon, coonstripe shrimp, albacore, and others. Because
11
those other fisheries are open only for limited portions of the calendar year, those fishermen were
12
deprived of valuable fishing opportunities, thereby diminishing their earnings in those fisheries.
13
Fishermen and fishery-dependent businesses, including Plaintiff, were therefore deprived of a
14
substantial portion of their annual revenue from those other fisheries during years impacted by
15
domoic acid-induced crab fishery closures, and will continue to suffer such injuries during future
16
domoic acid-induced fishery closures.
17
174.
Onshore crab wholesalers and processors, including Plaintiff, were deprived of a
18
substantial portion of their annual revenue during the 2015–16, 2016–17, and 2017–18 crab
19
seasons, and will continue to suffer such injuries during future domoic acid-induced fishery
20
closures. That revenue substantially depends on the supply of Dungeness crab and other species
21
harvested by commercial fishermen, which were not available due to the crab fishery delays that
22
curtailed and will continue to curtail fishing opportunity.
23
175.
The market for crab products, including Plaintiff’s, was and during future crab
24
seasons will be artificially depressed because of the stigma that Plaintiff’s crab products were and
25
are unsafe for human consumption, which adversely affects Plaintiff and its members. That
26
depressed market has caused Plaintiff and its members a substantial loss of income, and will
27
continue to do so as long as domoic acid outbreaks threaten the crab fishery.
28
SHER
EDLING LLP
COMPLAINT
75
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents