6/7/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly 2. P3,721.00 as reimbursement of medical expenses; and 3. 10% of the amounts awarded as attorney's fees. SO ORDERED.[11] Respondents moved to reconsider, but the NLRC stood its ground. Ruling of the Court of Appeals In a Petition for Certiorari[12] filed with the CA and docketed therein as CAG.R. SP No. 124685, respondents sought to set aside the above NLRC Decision and thus reinstate that of the Labor Arbiter's, arguing mainly that petitioner's illness is not compensable, and consequently, he is not entitled to his other money claims. Meanwhile, on July 17, 2012, respondents paid petitioner the amount of the judgment award - or the sum of P2,702,766.00. In return, petitioner was made to sign a Conditional Satisfaction of Judgment (All Without Prejudice to the Pending Petition for Certiorari in the Court of Appeals),[13] Receipt of Payment,[14] and Affidavit[15] - which were duly filed with the NLRC and CA. The Conditional Satisfaction of Judgment states, in part: 1. x x x. That payment is hereby made to complainant only to prevent imminent execution that this Honorable Office and the complainant are undertaking. 2. xxxx 3. That by virtue of said conditional payment of the judgment award x x x, herein complainant will no longer pursue the execution proceedings he initiated by virtue of the judgment x x x. 4. That this Conditional Satisfaction of Judgment is without prejudice to herein respondents’ Petition for Certiorari pending with the Court of Appeals docketed as CA GR SP No. 124685 x x x; and this Conditional Satisfaction of Judgment is being made only to prevent imminent execution being undertaken by this Honorable office and complainant. 5. That Complainant understands that in case of reversal and/or modification x x x by the Court of Appeals and/or the Supreme Court, he shall return whatever is due and owing to shipowners/manning agents without need of further demand.[16] (Emphasis in the original) On the other hand, the Affidavit essentially states: 3. x x x. That I understand this . payment is being made by the shipowners/manning agents to me only to prevent further execution proceedings that I have initiated with the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC); elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/62635 5/14