Table 9: RRP Clim ate Expenditure in the FY16 NEP: Size and Trends (‘000s PHP) RRP Clim ate Change Expenditure RRP Total Budget Budget share of CCtagged PAPs in RRP Share of RRP clim ate expenditure in the RRP budget RRP CCE as share of national clim ate expenditure FY 2015 NEP FY16 NGA Request FY16 NEP % of NGA Request included in NEP 59,395,495 81,898,320 83,152,223 102% % Change from FY 2015 NEP to FY16 NEP 40% 76,361,798 92% 97,886,690 96% 90,703,752 96% 93% 19% 78% 84% 92% 43% 45% 50% Adaptation response in the FY16 NEP RRP continues to be broad-based, although less diverse, with the exclusion of a quarter (23% ) of the PAPs in the FY16 NGA request (Figure 16). The mitigation response is narrowly focused on 16 PAPs from five NGAs, covering only four strategic priorities. mitigation from the FY 2015 attributed to the expansion of addition of four DOTC LRT and and the increased selectivity submission to the RRP. The shift to NEP can be the NGP, the BRT projects, of the DA’s Figure 16: RRP Clim ate Expenditure in the FY16 NEP: by Clim ate Pillar Mitigation 22% Adapatation 78%   40