57 Rollo (G .. R. No. 204819), pp. 487-528. 58 Rollo (G.R. No. 204934), pp. 871-1007. 59 Rollo (G.R. No. 204819), pp.1 306-1334; rollo, (G.R. No. 204934), pp. 98-132. 60 Rollo (G.R. No. 204819), pp. 736-780. 61 In her Motion for Leave to Intervene, Senator Pilar Ju liana S. Cayetano manifested that she was adopting as her own the arguments raised by respondents Dr. Esperanza I. Cabral, Jamie Galvez-Tan, and Dr. Alberto G. Romualdez in their Petition for Intervention; See rollo (G..R. No. 20481 9), pp. 173 1-1 783. After being directed by the Court to file their respective memoranda, intervenors Dr. Esperanza I. Cabral, Jamie Galvez-Tan, and Dr. Alberto G. Romualdez manjfested on November 18, 201 3, that they were adopting the arguments raised by Congressman Lagman in his Joint Memorandum; See rollo (G..R. No. 20481 9), pp. 3061-3070. On November 26, 201 3, Senator Pilar Juliana S. Cayetano file d her separate Memorandum ; see, rollo (G. .R. No. 204819), pp. 3032-3059. 62 Resolution dated March 15, 201 3. 63 Resolution, dated July 16, 201 3. 64 In its Resolution, dated August 27, 201 3, the Court required the parties to also include the following in their respective memoranda: 1. What is the relation of the first portion of Section 7 on Access to Family Planning to the theory that R.A. No. I 0354 is an anti-poor program that seeks to reduce the population of the poor? 2. How is the second paragraph of the same section related to the proposition that R.A. No. 10354 encourages sex among minors? 3. In relation to Section 23 on Prohibited Acts, where in the law can you find the definition of the term ' health care service provider' ? Is the definition of a ' public health care service provider ' found in Section 4, paragraph (n) of the law sufficient for the Court to understand the meaning of a 'private health care service provider' or should the Court refer to the Implementing Rules and Regulations which refer to 'health care providers'? 4. With respect to ' health care providers' under the Implementing Rules and Regulations, does it make a difference that they are called ' health care providers' and not ' health care service providers'? Does the fact that there is a missing word indicate that there is a difference or that the tautology being proposed actually refers to different objects? If in the affirmative, is there enough basis to say that the law is a criminal statute that has sufficient definitions for purposes of punitive action?