13. How does Section 23, paragraph (c) relate to Article 134 the Labor Code which requires employers to provide family planning services? 14. Section 24 provides that in case the offender is a juridical person, the penalties in the statute shall be imposed on the president or any responsible officer. For each offense in Section 23, how will the corporate officer be made responsible if there is no actual participation by the hospital board directors or officers of such action? Does Section 24 in relation to Section 23 require corporate action? What is the situation being contemplated in the second paragraph of Section 24 before there can be accountability for criminal violations? 15. Section 7 provides that access of minors to information and family planning services must be with the written consent of parents or guardians. Is the re a penalty in the law for those who will make these information and services (e.g. , contraceptives) available to minors without the parent's consent? How does this relate to Section 14 which requires the Department of Education to formulate a curriculum which 'shall be used by public schools' and ' may be adopted by private schools'? Is there a penalty for teaching sex education without the parents' or guardians' written consent? Correlatively, is there a penalty for private schools which do not teach sex education as formulated by the DepEd considering the use of the word ' may'? 65 Section I , R.A. No. 4729 66 Entitled "An Act Regulating the Practice of Pharmacy and Setting Standards of Pharmaceutical Education in the Philippines." 67 See http://www.pop.org/content/coercive-population-ploys-in-ph ilippines-1428, last visited October 17, 2013. 68 Entitled "Revising the Population Act of Nineteen Hundred And Seventy-One." 69 <http://www.senate.gov.ph/publications/PB%202009-03%20%20Promoting%20Reproductive%20Health.pdf->, last visited October 17, 2013. 70 Held in Cairo, Egypt from September 5- 13, 1994. 71 Section 17, R.A. 97 10. 72 See <www. nscb.gov.ph/secstat/d)pop.asp>; last accessed February 2 0, 2014. 73 Alliance /or the Family Foundation, Inc. (A LFI) v. Ochoa, rollo (G.R. No. 204934), p. 1408. 74 Id. 75 Consolidated Comment, OSG, rollo (G. R. No. 204819), p. 376.

Select target paragraph3

Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents