1/4/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [9] G.R. No. 232131, April 24, 2018. [10] Id. [11] Samahan ng mga Progresibong Kabataan (SPARK) v. Quezon City, supra note 8, at 385-386. [12] Gonzales v. COMELEC, 137 Phil. 471 (1969). [13] Estipona, Jr. v. Judge Lobrigo, G.R. No. 226679,August 15, 2017, 837 SCRA 160, 171. [14] Id. [15] Chavez v. Gonzales, 569 Phil. 155, 195 (2008). [16] The Diocese of Bacolod v. COMELEC, 751 Phil. 301, 444 (2015), citing National Press Club v. COMELEC, 283 Phil. 795, 810 (1992). [17] ABS-CBN Broadcasting Corporation v. COMELEC, 380 Phil. 780, 792 (2000). [18] Mutuc v. COMELEC, 146 Phil. 798, 805-806 (1970). [19] 758 Phil. 67 (2015). [20] BAYAN v. Ermita, 522 Phil. 201, 224 (2006), citing Reyes v. Bagatsing, 210 Phil. 457, 467 (1983). [21] Id. [22] Disini v. The Secretary of Justice, 727 Phil. 28, 121 (2014). [23] Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, Inc. v. Anti-Terrorism Council, 646 Phil. 452, 488 (2010). [24] Estrada v. Sandiganbayan, 421 Phil. 290, 355 (2001). [25] David v. Macapagal-Arroyo, 522 Phil. 705, 726 (2006). [26] Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network, Inc. v. Anti-Terrorism Council, supra note 23, at 489. [27] Id. at 485-486. [28] This test permits limitations on speech once a rational connection has been https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/65669 17/60