emissions of greenhouse gases, including emissions of carbon dioxide from coal
combustion by power plants.” 222
“Numerous activist groups are devoting substantial resources to anti-coal activities
to minimize or eliminate the use of coal as a source of electricity generation,
domestically and internationally, thereby further reducing the demand and pricing
for coal, and potentially materially and adversely impacting our future financial
results, liquidity and growth prospects.
Several non-governmental organizations have undertaken campaigns to minimize or
eliminate the use of coal as a source of electricity generation in the U.S. and across
the globe. In an effort to stop or delay coal mining activities, activist groups have
brought lawsuits challenging the issuance of individual coal leases, and challenging
the federal coal leasing program more broadly. Other lawsuits challenge historical
and pending regulatory approvals, permits and processes that are necessary to
conduct coal mining operations or to operate coal-fueled power plants, including socalled ‘sue and settle’ lawsuits where regulatory authorities in the past have reached
private agreements with environmental activists that often involve additional
regulatory restrictions or processes being implemented without formal
rulemaking.”223
“Peabody is an industry leader in advocating and collaborating to advance
development and deployment of clean coal technologies. There are two core steps
toward this goal:
1) Use commercially available high-efficiency, low-emissions (HELE) coalfueled generation technologies to drive down carbon dioxide (CO2) levels
and regulated emission rates.
2) Advance research and development initiatives as well as policies to improve
and commercialize next-generation carbon capture, use and storage (CCUS)
technologies, which offer the potential to achieve near-zero emissions from
coal-fueled power generation and other industrial processes.
With technology available today, HELE coal-fueled power plants can considerably
reduce emissions from power generation. For example, building a supercritical or
ultrasupercritical power plant instead of a subcritical plant of the same size can
reduce CO2 emissions by 20 to 30 percent.”224
“Peabody believes that next-generation carbon capture must be brought to
commercial readiness to transition toward energy from coal that is near-zero
emissions. While it is clear that achieving a low-carbon future comes at a very high
price, that price soars higher if carbon capture is not deployed. Government studies
Peabody Energy Corp. (2018), Delivering Results, Generating Value: 2018 Annual Report, p. 34, available at
https://www.peabodyenergy.com/Peabody/media/MediaLibrary/Investor%20Info/Annual%20Reports/2018Peabody-Annual-Report-02.pdf?ext=.pdf (last accessed on 12 September 2019).
223 Id.
224 Peabody Energy Corp. (2017), Corporate and Social Responsibility Report, p. 21, available at
https://www.peabodyenergy.com/Peabody/media/MediaLibrary/Media%20Center/CSR%20web%20photos/Peabody
_CSR2017.pdf (last accessed on 12 September 2019).
222
Annex D: Corporate Statements on Climate Change and Human Rights | 58
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents