which did not occur in this case. While disability should be understood less on its medical significance but more on the loss of earning capacity, the appellate court’s sweeping observations that “the hostile working environment and the emotional turmoil suffered by [herein] respondent from his employers caused him mental and emotional stress that led to severe mental disorder and rendered him permanently unable to perform any work,” and that “his working condition increased the risk of sustaining” the illness complained of do not lie. 2. Apperture unfilled with bone over three (3) inches without brain injury . . . . . . . . . . Gr.3 3. Severe paralysis of both upper or lower extremities or one upper and one lower extremity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gr.1 4. Moderate paralysis of two (2) extremities producing moderate difficulty in movements with self-care activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gr.6 5. Slight paralysis affecting one extremity producing slight difficulty with self-care activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gr.10 6. Severe mental disorder or Severe Complex Cerebral function disturbance or post-traumatic psychoneurosis which require aid and attendance as to render worker permanently unable to perform any work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gr.1 7. Moderate mental disorder or moderate brain functional disturbance which limits worker to the activities of daily living with some directed care or attendance . . . . Gr.6 8. Slight mental disorder or disturbance that requires little attendance or aid and which interferes to a slight degree with the working capacity of the claimant . . . . . Gr.10 9. Incurable imbecility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Gr.1 (emphasis supplied)