Shortly after her return or on February 14, 2000, Divina filed a complaint  before the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) against Sunace, one Adelaide Perez, the Taiwanese broker, and the employer-foreign principal alleging that she was jailed for three months and that she was underpaid.    The following day or on February 15, 2000, Labor Arbitration Associate Regina T. Gavin issued Summons  to the Manager of Sunace, furnishing it with a copy of Divina’s complaint and directing it to appear for mandatory conference on February 28, 2000.   The scheduled mandatory conference was reset.  It appears to have been concluded, however.   On April 6, 2000, Divina filed her Position Paper  claiming that under her original one-year contract and the 2-year extended contract which was with the knowledge and consent of Sunace, the following amounts representing income tax and savings were deducted:    [2] [3] [4]   Year 1997 1998 1999       Deduction for Income Tax   NT10,450.00 NT9,500.00 NT13,300.00 Deduction for Savings   NT23,100.00 NT36,000.00 NT36,000.00; [5] and while the amounts deducted in 1997 were refunded to her, those deducted in 1998 and 1999 were not.     On even date, Sunace, by its Proprietor/General Manager Maria Luisa Olarte, filed its Verified Answer and Position Paper,  claiming as follows,  quotedverbatim: [6]                 COMPLAINANT IS NOT ENTITLED             FOR THE REFUND OF HER 24 MONTHS             SAVINGS                           3.  Complainant could not anymore claim nor entitled for the refund of her 24 months savings as she already took back her saving already last year and the employer did not deduct any money from her salary, in accordance with a Fascimile Message from the respondent SUNACE’s employer, Jet Crown