3/25/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [19] Travelaire & Tours Corporation v. National Labor Relations Commission, 294 SCRA 505 (1998); Suarez v. National Labor Relations Commission, 293 SCRA 496 (1998); Autobus Workers' Union v. National Labor Relations Commission, 291 SCRA 219 (1998); Prangan v. National Labor Relations Commission, 289 SCRA 142 (1998); International Pharmaceuticals, Inc v. National Labor Relations Commission, 287 SCRA 213 (1998); Villa v. National Labor Relations Commission, 284 SCRA 105 (1998). [20] Gandara Mill Supply v. National Labor Relations Commission, 300 SCRA 702 (1998); National Union of Workers in Hotels, Restaurants and Allied Industries v. National Labor Relations Commission, 287 SCRA 192 (1998). [21] Rollo, 72. [22] Civil Code, Article 2217. [23] Philippine National Bank v. Court of Appeals, 266 SCRA 136 (1997). [24] Ong v. Court of Appeals, 301 SCRA 387 (1999); Philtranco Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 273 SCRA 562 (1997). [25] Del Rosario v. Court of Appeals, 267 SCRA 158 (1997). [26] Civil Code, Article 2231. [27] Petitioners have never questioned the jurisdiction of the labor arbiter or the NLRC over private respondent's claim for damages. See Zamboanga v. Buat, 243 SCRA 47 (1995); Ocheda v. Court of Appeals, 214 SCRA 629 (1992). [28] Congregation of the Religious of the Virgin Mary v. Court of Appeals, 291 SCRA 385 (1998). [29] Philtranco Service Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, supra. Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/50003 16/16