Decision 2 G.R. No. 224742 On April 8, 1994, Prudencio De Guzman (Prudencio) and Arlene De Guzman (Arlene) were married before Branch 106 of the Regional Trial Court of Quezon City. Their marriage was solemnized by Judge Julieto P. Tabiolo, 5 with Marriage License No. 1031606 issued on April 6, 1994. 6 In 2007, Prudencio abandoned his wife and children. 7 In December 2009, a friend informed Arlene that Prudencio contracted a second marriage with a certain Jean Basan (Basan) on December 17, 2009 at the Immaculate Church in Las Pifias City. 8 On January 8, 2010, Arlene went to the Immaculate Church and confirmed that Prudencio had indeed married Basan. Arlene secured a copy of Prudencio and Basan's marriage contract at the City Civil Registrar's Office. 9 Arlene then filed before the Office of the City Prosecutor a Complaint against Prudencio for bigamy under Article 349 10 of the Revised Penal Code. 11 The Information read: That sometime in the month of December, 2009 in the City of Las Pin.as, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court, the above-named accused, being then legally married to one Arlene de Guzman y de Jesus which marriage is still existing and has not been legally dissolved, did then and there wil[l]fully, unlawfully and feloniously contract a second marriage with one Jean Basan y Hubilla, which second marriage has all the essential and formal requisites for validity. CONTRARY TO LAW. 12 On arraignment, Prudencio pleaded not guilty to the crime charged. 13 Trial on the merits then ensued. ! 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Id. at 25. Id. at 30. Id. at 25. Id. at 26. Id. REV. PEN. CODE, art. 349 provides: ARTICLE 349. Bigamy. - The penalty of prisi6n mayor shall be imposed upon any person who shall contract a second or subsequent marriage before the fonner marriage has been legally dissolved, or before the absent spouse has been declared presumptively dead by means of a judgment rendered in the proper proceedings. Rollo, p. 26. Id. Id.

Select target paragraph3