6/8/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly 328 Phil. 72 FIRST DIVISION [ G.R. No. 74495, July 11, 1996 ] DUMEZ COMPANY AND TRANS-ORIENT ENGINEERS, INC., PETITIONERS, VS. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION AND VERONICO EBILANE, RESPONDENTS. DECISION HERMOSISIMA, JR., J.: Before us is a petition for certiorari assailing the Decision[1] of the National Labor Relations Commission (hereafter, NLRC)[2] in an illegal dismissal case[3] involving an overseas contract worker who contracted a debilitating illness while rendering services under a subsisting job contract in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The assailed Decision affirmed the award[4] by the Workers' Assistance and Adjudication Office of the Philippine Overseas Employment Administration (hereafter POEA) in favor of private respondent in the amount of U.S.$1,110.00 or its peso equivalent as and for his medical compensation benefits. The facts of the case are not in dispute: On May 21, 1982, petitioner Dumez Company, a French company, through petitioner Trans-Orient Engineers, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Philippines, engaged the services of private respondent Veronico Ebilane as carpenter for one of its projects in the Middle East, with Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, as his place of actual employment. The parties executed and signed a one-year overseas employment agreement embodying the terms and conditions of private respondent's employment. Private respondent commenced performance of said contract on July 3, 1982. On August 31, 1982, while at the job site, private respondent was suddenly seized by abdominal pain and rushed to the Riyadh Central Hospital were appendectomy was performed on him. During his confinement, he developed right-sided weakness and numbness and difficulty of speaking which was found to have been caused by Atrial Fibrillation and CVA embolism. In a letter dated September 22, 1982, petitioners formally terminated private respondent's employment effective September 29, 1982, up to which time petitioners paid private respondent his salaries under his employment contract. Thereafter, on October 13, 1982, private respondent was repatriated to Manila. On November 23, 1982, private respondent filed a complaint for illegal dismissal against petitioners. Such complaint was filed with the Workers' Assistance and elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/33843 1/5

Select target paragraph3