FIRST DIVISION
G.R. No. 202976, February 19, 2014
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MERVIN GAHI, Accused–
Appellant.
DECISION
LEONARDO–DE CASTRO, J.:
This is an appeal from a Decision1 dated August 31, 2011 of the Court of Appeals in
CA–G.R. CEB–CR.–H.C. No. 00335, entitled People of the Philippines v. Mervin Gahi,
which affirmed the Decision2 dated April 22, 2005 of the Regional Trial Court of
Carigara, Leyte, Branch 13 in Criminal Case Nos. 4202 and 4203. The trial court
convicted appellant Mervin Gahi of two counts of rape defined under Article 266–A of
the Revised Penal Code.
The accusatory portions of the two criminal Informations, both dated October 9, 2002,
each charging appellant with one count of rape are reproduced below:
[Criminal Case No. 4202]
chanRoblesvi rtua lLawl ibra ry
That on or about the 11th day of March, 2002, in the Municipality of Capoocan, Province
of Leyte, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above–
named accused, with deliberate intent and with lewd designs and by use of force and
intimidation, armed with a knife, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously
had carnal knowledge with (sic) [AAA3 ] against her will and a 16[–]year old girl, to her
damage and prejudice.4
[Criminal Case No. 4203]
That on or about the 12th day of March, 2002, in the Municipality of Capoocan, Province
of Leyte, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above–
named accused, with deliberate intent and with lewd designs and by use of force and
intimidation, armed with a knife, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously
had carnal knowledge with (sic) [AAA] against her will and a 16[–]year old girl, to her
damage and prejudice.5
ChanRobles Vi rtualaw lib rary
When he was arraigned on November 4, 2002, appellant pleaded “NOT GUILTY” to the
charges leveled against him.6 Thereupon, the prosecution and the defense presented
their evidence.
The pertinent facts of this case were synthesized by the Court of Appeals and presented
in the assailed August 31, 2011 Decision in this manner:
The Prosecution’s Story
chanRoblesvi rtua lLawl ibra ry
The following witnesses were presented by the prosecution, who testified, as follows: