FIRST DIVISION G.R. No. 202976, February 19, 2014 PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. MERVIN GAHI, Accused– Appellant. DECISION LEONARDO–DE CASTRO, J.: This is an appeal from a Decision1 dated August 31, 2011 of the Court of Appeals in CA–G.R. CEB–CR.–H.C. No. 00335, entitled People of the Philippines v. Mervin Gahi, which affirmed the Decision2 dated April 22, 2005 of the Regional Trial Court of Carigara, Leyte, Branch 13 in Criminal Case Nos. 4202 and 4203. The trial court convicted appellant Mervin Gahi of two counts of rape defined under Article 266–A of the Revised Penal Code. The accusatory portions of the two criminal Informations, both dated October 9, 2002, each charging appellant with one count of rape are reproduced below: [Criminal Case No. 4202] chanRoblesvi rtua lLawl ibra ry That on or about the 11th day of March, 2002, in the Municipality of Capoocan, Province of Leyte, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above– named accused, with deliberate intent and with lewd designs and by use of force and intimidation, armed with a knife, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously had carnal knowledge with (sic) [AAA3 ] against her will and a 16[–]year old girl, to her damage and prejudice.4 [Criminal Case No. 4203] That on or about the 12th day of March, 2002, in the Municipality of Capoocan, Province of Leyte, Philippines and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above– named accused, with deliberate intent and with lewd designs and by use of force and intimidation, armed with a knife, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously had carnal knowledge with (sic) [AAA] against her will and a 16[–]year old girl, to her damage and prejudice.5 ChanRobles Vi rtualaw lib rary When he was arraigned on November 4, 2002, appellant pleaded “NOT GUILTY” to the charges leveled against him.6 Thereupon, the prosecution and the defense presented their evidence. The pertinent facts of this case were synthesized by the Court of Appeals and presented in the assailed August 31, 2011 Decision in this manner: The Prosecution’s Story chanRoblesvi rtua lLawl ibra ry The following witnesses were presented by the prosecution, who testified, as follows:

Select target paragraph3