XII. Workshop 2&3: SETTING STANDARDS, REVIEWING PROCESSES, PLANNING AND STRATEGIZING FOR REGIONAL GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE (GBV) MAPPING ATTY. KRISSI SHAFFINA TWYLA A. RUBIN OIC, Gender Equality and Women’s Human Rights Center (GEWHRC) Commission on Human Rights (CHR) Atty. Rubin reiterated the mechanics and expected outputs from the workshop in relation to the previously discussed project terms of reference. Soon after, participants from each of the regional offices sat together to discuss the scope of mapping to be done in their respective regions in terms of LGU and GBV to be covered, criteria for selection of LGUs, process and methods to be used, data sources to be engaged and forms of follow-through. In particular, the participants were guided by the following questions during the discussion. 1. Are we agreed on the scope and limitations of the mapping? a) Three cities/municipalities in the regions; b) GBV to be covered: RA 9262 (VAWC) / RA 8353 (rape) and take note of emerging issues. 2. What criteria shall we follow in selecting cities/ municipalities? Pilot areas (highly urbanized city, provincial capital city, multi-cultural areas, disaster areas) a) Incidence of VAW or Rape? Lows and Highs? b) Center and Periphery? c) Income? d) Good relations with LGU? Possibility of coordination? 3. Process/ What method will be used? a) b) c) d) FGD vs usual forum or CBD? Value added of FGD – stories, smaller; Mix of FGD and KII? Separate LGU and community women or women organizations? 46