contracting the disease. However, appellant failed to discharge the burden of
proof required by the law.
Based on medical findings, Open Angle Glaucoma arises as a
complication of chronic obstruction of aqueous humor reabsorption in the
trabecular meshwork. It is usually asymptomatic and only rarely causes ocular
pain or corneal edema. The treatment is primarily medical. Surgery to prevent
permanent visual loss is necessary in only a minority of patients (Ref.: Harrisons
Principles of Internal Medicine, 11th edition, p. 71).
As suggested by the foregoing medical findings, the cleaning of chemicalspill-oil on deck and the spraying of [naphtha] chemical inside the tank were not
predisposing factors in the contraction of Open Angle Glaucoma. Thus, we
believe that the respondent System correctly ruled against the compensability of
[petitioners] ailment.[9]
An appeal from the adverse decision was filed before the CA.[10] On August
17, 1999, however, the petition was denied due course and the CA accordingly
dismissed the case on the ground that petitioner failed to adduce substantial
evidence supporting the conclusion that the working conditions as a seaman
increased the risk of contracting his chronic open angle glaucoma.[11]
Petitioners motion for reconsideration was subsequently denied;[12] hence,
this recourse.
The lone issue presented for consideration is whether the work of petitioner
as a seaman contributed even in a small degree in or had increased the risk of
contracting his chronic open angle glaucoma.[13]
While petitioner admits that chronic open angle glaucoma is not one of those
listed as occupational diseases under the law he nonetheless maintains that the
cause of glaucoma is still unknown and predisposition thereto is due to both
physical and emotional factors. In his case, petitioner asserts that he had been
exposed to these elements for 18 years during his employment. He claims that as a
utility staff he performed odd jobs without fail such as cleaning chemical-spill-oil
on deck, slat dislodging, and spraying naphtha chemical and washing dirt and rusts
inside the tank. According to him, these strenuous tasks required climbing, bending