In the 61-older age bracket, one (1) or four percent (4%) was a resident of San Roque. None came from the other ffour barangays. In sum, there were five (5) or five point six percent (5.6%) who were 17younger, fourteen (14) or fifteen point seven percent (15.7%) who were aged 18-21, forty-six (46) or fifty-one point seven percent (51.7%) who belonged to the 22-40 age group, twenty-three (23) or twenty-five point eight percent (25.8%) who were part of the 41-60 age bracket, and one (1) or one point two percent (1.2%) were 61 years of age or even older. The age grouping followed the grouping of Erik Erikson’a (Orenstein & Lewis, 2020) Stages of Psychosocial Development, particularly on Adolescence (13-17), Young adulthood (18-40), Adulthood (41-60) and Old Age Period (61 and Older). From the findings as presented in Table 2, data reveal that 5.6% of the VAW survivors were minors, having been 17 years old or younger at the time of the data gathering, and 1.2% was a senior citizen, which consequently meant that they were twice vulnerable as VAW survivors. Data likewise meant that the majority of the total population belonged to the age bracket of 22-40 who were classified as Young Adults in psychosocial development. TABLE 3. DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS ACCORDING TO CIVIL STATUS CIVIL STATUS Single Legally Married Live-in (Living with Partner) Separated TOTAL 1 TUMAGA (f =28) f % 2 7.1 8 28.6 2 SAN ROQUE (f =25) f % 2 8 16 64 3 STA MARIA (f =17) f % 0 0 7 41.2 4 MERCEDES 5 PASONANCA (f =12) f % 1 8.3 3 25 f 0 4 (f =7) % 0 57.1 TOTAL % (f =89) 5 38 5.6 42.7 18 64.3 7 28 2 11.8 2 16.7 3 42.9 32 36 0 28 0 100 0 25 0 100 8 17 47 100 6 12 50 100 0 7 0 100 14 89 15.7 100 71