04/02/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [90] Integrated Bar of the Phils. v. Hon. Zamora, 392 Phil. 618 (2000). [91] Tatad v. Secretary of Energy, 346 Phil. 321 (1997). [92] Vide Compliance of September 1, 2008 of respondents. [93] Vide Manifestation of September 4, 2008 of respondents. [94] Supra note 81. [95] Id. citing Province of Batangas v. Romulo, supra note 87. [96] Id. citing Lacson v. Perez, 410 Phil. 78 (2001). [97] Id. citingProvince of Batangas v. Romulo, supra note 87. [98] Id. citing Albaña v. Comelec, 478 Phil. 941 (2004); Chief Supt. Acop v. Guingona Jr., 433 Phil. 62 (2002); SANLAKAS v. Executive Secretary Reyes, 466 Phil. 482 (2004). [99] US v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629 (1953); US v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn, 166 U.S. 290, 308-310 (1897); Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc., 323 U.S. 37, 43 (1944); Gray v. Sanders, 372 U.S. 368, 376 (1963); Defunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974). [100] Supra note 87. [101] G.R. No. 178920, October 15, 2007, 536 SCRA 290. [102] Chavez v. PCGG, 366 Phil. 863, 871 (1999). [103] G.R. No. 178830, July 14, 2008. [104] Supra note 98. [105] Ortega v. Quezon City Government, G.R. No. 161400, September 2, 2005, 469 SCRA 388. [106] Alunan III v. Mirasol, 342 Phil. 476 (1997); Viola v. Alunan III, 343 Phil. 184 (1997); Chief Superintendent Acop v. Guingona, Jr., supra note 98; Roble Arrastre, Inc. v. Villaflor, G.R. No. 128509, August 22, 2006, 499 SCRA 434, 447. [107] CONSTITUTION, Article III, Sec. 7. [108] 80 Phil. 383 (1948). [109] Legaspi v. Civil Service Commission, G.R. No. L-72119, May 29, 1987, 150 elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/47263 59/203