1/4/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [40] Id. at 117. [41] Id. at 117-118. [42] Id. at 158-210. The case is entitled Yushi Kondo, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Commission, Third Division, Hon. Gregorio O. Bilog III, Hon Alex A. Lopez, Hon. Pablo E. Espiritu, Jr., in their official capacities as Commissioners of the NLRC Third Division, Public Respondents; Toyota Boshoku (Phils.) Corporation, Mamoru Matsunaga. Kazuki Miura and Joselito Ledesma, Private Respondents, docketed as CAG.R. SP No. 116167. [43] Id. at 83-103; penned by Associate Justice Vicente S.E. Veloso with Associate Justices Francisco P. Acosta and Angelita A. Gacutan, concurring. [44] Id. at 94. [45] Id. at 96-98. [46] Id. at 98. [47] Id. at 105. [48] Id. at 31. [49] Id. at 32. [50] Id. at 33. [51] Id. at 34. [52] Philippine Bank of Communications v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 218901, February 15, 2017, 818 SCRA 68, 74. [53] Guzman v. Guzman, G.R. No. 172588, March 13, 2013, 693 SCRA 318, 327. Italics supplied. [54] Miranda v. Sandiganbayan, G.R. Nos. 144760-61, August 2, 2017, 833 SCRA 614, 633. [55] Madrigal Transport, Inc. v. Lapanday Holdings Corporation, G.R. No. 156067, August 11, 2004, 436 SCRA 123, 134. [56] In Madrigal Transport, Inc. v. Lapanday Holdings Corp., supra, the Court held that a writ of certiorari may be issued only for the correction of errors of jurisdiction or grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. The writ cannot https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/65727 12/14