6/8/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly Just like our local domestic house helpers who receive their wages directly from their employers without any payslip or voucher to acknowledge payment and receipt, we do not expect the case of herein complainant x x x to be any different. It is, therefore, understandable that no payslip or payroll could be presented by respondent agency. [34] We find this NLRC view to be a fair and credible assessment of the employment relationship between Barit and her Saudi employer, at least, in relation to the payment of Barit's wages. In sum, we hold that the NLRC committed no grave abuse of discretion in dismissing the complaint. The CA thus erred in granting the petition for certiorari. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the assailed Decision and Resolution of the Court of Appeals are set aside, and the Decision of the NLRC dated August 28, 2006 is REINSTATED. SO ORDERED. Carpio, (Chairperson), Leonardo-De Castro,* Peralta,** and Perez, JJ., concur. * Designated as Acting Member of the Second Division per Special Order No. 1006 dated June 10, 2011. ** Additional member in lieu of Associate Justice Maria Lourdes P. A. Sereno per Special Order No. 1040 dated July 6, 2011. [1] Rollo, pp. 3-14. [2] Id. at 16-25; penned by Associate Justice Myrna Dimaranan Vidal, and concurred in by Associate Justices Jose L. Sabio, Jr. and Jose C. Reyes, Jr. [3] Id. at 27. [4] Entitled "Bella Agcaoili Barit v. NLRC and Jones International Manpower Services, Inc." [5] Rollo, p. 161. [6] Id. at 262-266. [7] Id. at 125-133. [8] Id. at 139-140. elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/32168 7/9