q- Could you still recall the time? a- 12:00 noon. q- Now, please tell this Honorable Court what happened to you on that date and time? a- He pursue the same act against my person on the process as before [sic]. q- What action did you do, if any, for the third time that the accused made [sic]? a- He always warned me.[26] Likewise, with respect to Criminal Case No. FC-00-784 (April 19, 2004), “AAA" testified as follows: q- Aside from the April 10, April 12 and then April 14, 2004 [incidents,] was there any other incident that happened to you? a- April 19, 7:00 a.m. q- What year? a- 2004. q- Can you still recall the incident x x x? a- Yes. q- And please tell this Honorable Court the place of the incident? a- The same situation, in the grassy area he performed the same acts against my person. q- Will you please tell this court what did you do when the incident happened? a- He always poke[d] a knife that's why I [did not] inform my parents about it.[27] "AAA's" bare statements that appellant repeated what he had done on her previously were not enough to establish beyond reasonable doubt the incidents subject of Criminal Case Nos. FC-00-781, FC-00-784 and FC-00-785. Said declarations were mere general conclusions. The prosecution must endeavor to present in detailed fashion the manner by which each of the crimes was committed. "[E]very charge of rape is a separate and distinct crime and each must be proved beyond reasonable doubt."[28] There is no reason why the foregoing principle should not be applied in the aforementioned cases. Prescinding therefrom, appellant should be acquitted in these cases.