6/14/2021 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [9] Id. at 33-51. [10] Id. at 128-162. [11] Deocariza v. Fleet Management Services Philippines, Inc., G.R. No. 229955, July 23, 2018, 873 SCRA 397, 406, citing Leoncio v. MSTMarine Services (Phils.), Inc., 822 Phil. 494, 504 (2017). [12] Id., citing Maersk Filipinos Crewing, Inc. v. Ramos, G.R. No. 184256, January 18, 2017, 814 SCRA 428, 442. [13] Id., citing Manila Shipmanagement & Manning, Inc., el al. v. Aninang, 824 Phil. 916, 925 (2018); enumerating the following as exceptions: 1) when the findings are grounded entirely on speculations, surmises, or conjectures; 2) when the inference made is manifestly mistaken, absurd, or impossible; 3) when there is grave abuse of discretion; 4) when the judgment is based on misapprehension of facts; 5) when the findings of fact are conflicting; 6) when in making its findings, the Court of Appeals went beyond the issues of the case, or its findings are contrary to the admissions of both the appellant and the appellee; 7) when the findings are contrary to that of the trial court; 8) when the findings are conclusions without citation of specific evidence on which they are based; 9) when the facts set forth in the petition, as well as in the petitioner's main and reply briefs, are disputed by the respondent; 10) when the findings of fact are premised on the supposed absence of evidence and contradicted by the evidence on record; or 1 1) when the Court of Appeals manifestly overlooked certain relevant facts not disputed by the parties, which, if properly considered, would justify a different conclusion. [14] See Deocariza v. Fleet Management Services Philippines, Inc., et al., supra note 11. [15] Formerly Articles 191 to 193 of the LABOR CODE. [16] 2010 POEA-SEC, Definition of Terms, Item No. 11 (a) and (b). [17] 817 Phil. 84(2017). [18] 740 Phil. 175(2014). [19] 728 Phil. 244(2014). [20] 715 Phil. 454(2013). [21] Vetyard Terminals & Shipping Services, Inc., et al, v. Snares, 728 Phil. 527, 534 (2014), citing Escarcha v. Leonis Navigation Co., Inc., and/or World Marine Panama, S.A., 637 Phil. 418, 433 (2010). https://elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/66745 8/9