This means that we cannot drag all participants in one place. It is going to be too hard. 2. To include in the criteria of giving national and local awards the concrete and implemented projects made by IPs collaborating with other government agencies and CSOs on IP issues. This would be on the actions being undertaken not on the talks that we have for now. Issues and concerns on the proposes IP Rights Observatory 1. What is the composition of the IP Rights Observatory? Is it limited to the NCIP officials and employees? 2. To include identifying places highly suspected; 3. To identify local personalities espousing NPA recruitment enticing other IPs to join their movement; 4. To include data on what government projects that need immediate implementation and to be closely monitored. Key elements & components to be incorporated in the IP Rights Observatory 1. In the conduct of inquiries/investigations, it should be done by a composite team which includes CHR, AFP, PNP and other concerned agencies. The acceptance from the security groups such as PNP, AFP is easier if they are included in the group. 2. Inclusion and/or collaboration The acceptance from the security with other government agencies groups such as PNP, AFP is easier if concerned during the conduct of they are included in the group. national inquiry. “ Support expected from our agency 1. The creation of IP Desk and designation of IP Officer in every AFP/PNP units nationwide (we can still place an IP desk in Cebu for those IPs migrated in the area); 2. Implementation of the MOA entered into by and between the AFP and NCIP (it was not mentioned in the accomplishments to date, it will be concrete and will become the basis of presentations); and; 3. Inclusion in the criteria of giving of awards for AFP/PNP personnel who have great contribution on the functions of the IP Rights Observatory. For example, the Metro Bank award gave at least P150T yearly for those policemen/law enforcers who showed good performances. 81