Based on the study of Family Planning Spending
Assessment10 (FPSA) for LGUs, the provinces,
cities and municipalities of the country spent about
Php 1.9 billion for family planning in 2019. This
covers projects and activities that were conducted
by the LGUs during the year reported to support
the delivery of FP services. It does not include yet
the LGU’s expenditures for personnel hired to
provide the FP services.
Municipalities had the biggest share in FP funding
with around 63 percent of the total expenditures
of all LGUs, while cities and provinces contributed
about 26 percent and 11 percent, respectively.
Compared to 2018, the expenditures of the LGUs
for family planning related programs, plans, and
activities decreased by about 17 percent from last
year’s Php2.27 billion pesos.
Analysis of 2017-2019 LIPH and AOPs
The Local Investment Plan for Health (LIPH) is
a 3-year strategic or medium-term plan prepared
by the provinces, highly urbanized cities (HUC),
and independent component cities (ICC). The
yearly interpretation of the LIPH is the Annual
Operational Plans (AOP), which serve as
localization tools of national health programs,
and basis for resource mobilization and technical
assistance provision and allocation. The LIPH
and the AOP is an important instrument since the
Universal Health Care Act specifically referenced
the former that it shall be the basis for matching
grants and provision of assistance from the
national government and donors relative to its
implementation.
USAID ReachHealth Project did a desk review
of the submitted health investment plans from
LGUs to the Centers for Health Development and
the Bureau of Local Health Systems Development
of DOH. Based on the review, only 83 out of 124
proposed a significant budget allocation for family
planning in 2017, while there were only 96 LGUs
in 2018, and only 77 LGUs in 2019 respectively.
This shows a somewhat decreasing trend in the
number of LGUs that includes family planning as
one of its priority programs.
The USAID ReachHealth project was unable to do
a complete analysis of the 124 health investment
plans due to incomplete submission of LGUs; the
budget indicated in the plan is not disaggregated
by source of fund; budget was too insignificant;
and FP related activities were solely charged to the
DOH National or Center for Health Development
budget.
Among the family planning activities prioritized
and included in the health investment
plans include procurement of commodities,
training, workshops, program implementation
review, advocacy materials and activities, and
improvement of facility used for provision of
family planning services were included in the LGU
plans.
Table 2 shows the three-year comparison of total
LGU budget allocated for health versus budget
allocated specific to the family planning program.
An average of 1.86 percent has been allocated by
LGUs for family planning in the last three years
with 2019 having the highest average percentage of
allocation.
All 124 LGUs composed of 81 provinces, 33 highly
urbanized cities, 5
Table 2: Total LGU Budget for Health vis-a-vis FP, 2017 - 2019
independent component
Year
LGU Budget
Total LGU Budget
Ave. % of FP Budget
cities, 4 component cities
Allocated for Family
Allocated for Health
out of Total LGU
& 1 municipality (Pateros
Planning
Budget for Health
in NCR) are mandated
2017
Php 373,216,246.00
Php 5,663,706,147,402.00
1.87%
to develop its LIPH for
2018
419,823,237.00
44,906,823,200.00
1.57%
the period 2017-2019.
2019
401,666,822.00
5,666,521,822,528.00
2.13%
However, only 85 percent Source: CHDs and the Bureau of Local Health Systems Development of DOH
were able to comply.
10
Study of FP Spending Assessment for LGUs,Track 20 Project,
Avenir Health
33 2019 Annual Report Responsible Parenthood and Reproductive Health Act of 2012
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents