6/7/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [116] Metropolitan Manila Development Authority v. Viron Transportation Co., Inc., 557 Phil. 121, 140 (2007). [117] Tawang Multi-Purpose Cooperative v. La Trinidad Water District, supra note 70, at 406. [118] James M. Imbong v. Hon. Paquito N. Ochoa, 732 Phil. 1, 108-109 (2014). [119] Guidelines in the Issuance of Hold-Departure Orders. [120] Miriam Defensor Santiago v. Conrado M. Vasquez, 291 Phil. 664, 680 (1993). [121] Section 1(a). DOJ Circular No. 41. [122] Section 1(b). DOJ Circular No. 41. [123] Section 2(a). DOJ Circular No. 41. [124] Section 2(b). DOJ Circular No. 41. [125] Sections 1(c) and 2(c), DOJ Circular No. 41. [126] Supra note 78, at 133-134 (1991). [127] Rollo (G.R. No. 199034), Volume I, pp. 45-46. [128] Id. at 47-48. [129] Id. at 49-59. [130] Rollo (G.R. No. 197930), pp. 30-35. [131] Section 1. Hold Departure Order. - The Secretary of Justice may issue an HDO under any of the following instances: (a) Against the accused, irrespective of nationality, in criminal cases falling within the jurisdiction of courts below the Regional Trial Courts (RTCs). If the case against the accused is pending trial, the application under oath of an interested party must be supported by (a) a certified true copy of the complaint or information and (b) a Certification from the Clerk of Court concerned that criminal case is still pending. (b) Against the alien whose presence is required either as a defendant, respondent, or elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/64165 44/70