Dissenting Opinion
- 27 -
G.R. No. 224469
land is hardly any protection against any potential abuse that the forest may
endure.
~
·
Take this case, for instance. Petitioners herein would like to impress
upon the Court their unfortunate predicament of being incarcerated for the
mere act of cutting one tree, which they did only in their humble exercise of
cultural integrity as indigenous peoples for the construction of a communal
toilet. We must direct our attention, however, to some points to consider.
First, the Infonnation states that petitioners knowingly cut the tree
with the use of an unregistered power chainsaw. 74 This was admitted by
petitioners in their Salaysay ng Pagtatanggol in saying that "ginamit ang
chainsaw sa pagputol upang hindi ma-aksaya ang kahoy para ito ay
mapakinabangan sang-ayon sa nabanggit sa itaas. " 75 Realistically
speaking, the fact that an IP was able to get a hold of, more so learn how to
operate, such a sophisticated tool cannot be harmonized with their supposed
nature as a people known to survive in isolated locations, with very little to
no access to even the most basic social, commercial, and economical goods
and services. On a related note, what then would the implication of the
present majority opinion be to petitioners' violation of R.A. No. 9175
entitled "An Act Regulating the Ownership, Possession, Sale, Importation
and Use of Chainsaws, Penalizing Violations thereof and for other
Purposes" or the Chainsaw Act of 2002, which penalizes the mere
possession of a chainsaw without first securing the necessary permit from
the DENR? 76
Second, the records of the case are bereft of evidence sufficient to
prove that the cutting was, indeed, for the purpose of building a communal
toilet. As borne by the records, the defense merely offered the lone
testimony of Brgy. Captain Aceveda without any documentary exhibits. In
his testimony, he revealed that the cutting of the tree was upon the initiative
of "a certain Non-Governmental Organization (NGO)." 77
74
Id. at 49.
Records, p. 18.
76
Section 7 ofR.A. No. 9175 provides:
SEC. 7. Penal Provisions.
1. Selling, Purchasing, Re-selling, Transferring, Distributing or Possessing a Chainsaw Without a
Proper Permit. - Any person who sells, purchases, transfers the ownership, distributes, or otherwise
disposes or possesses a chainsaw without first securing the necessary permit from the Department shall be
punished with imprisonment of four (4) years, two (2) months and one (1) day to six years or a fine of not
less than Fifteen thousand pesos (PhP 15,000.00) but not more than Thirty thousand pesos (PhP 30,000.00)
or both at the discretion of the court, and the chainsaw/s confiscated in favor of the government.
xxxx
4. Actual Unlawful Use of Chainsaw. -Any person who is found to be in possession of a chainsaw
and uses the same to cut trees and timber in forest land or elsewhere except as authorized by the
Department shall be penalized with imprisonment of six (6) years and one (1) day to eight (8) years or a
fine of not less than Thirty thousand pesos (PhP 30,000.00) but not more than Fifty thousand pesos (PhP
50,000.00) or both at the discretion of the court without prejudice to being prosecuted for a separate offense
that may have been simultaneously committed. The chainsaw unlawfully used shall be likewise confi?71sated
.
in favor of the government.
/,,,,,,.-.
77
Rollo, pp. 59 and 142. Brgy. Captain Aceveda testified as follows:
(/
75
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents