[11] Exhibits B-2, TSN, Mosquera, July 21, 1987, p. 7. [12] Id., pp. 8-9. [13] Spelled in TSN as Laila. [14] Id., pp. 10-11. [15] Exhibits C, C-1, and C-2, Id., pp. 14-15. [16] Id., p. 19. [17] Id., pp. 20-21. [18] Id., pp. 21-22; Exhibits D and D-1. [19] Records, p. 1. [20] TSN, October 11, 1990, p. 5. [21] TSNs, October 23, 1990, p. 35 and 38-40; April 4, 1991, p. 5. [22] Ibid., pp. 8-11. [23] TSN, May 16, 1991, p. 7. [24] See Note No. 2, supra. [25] CA Rollo, pp. 56-91; Diu filed a Notice of Appeal but failed to submit an appeal brief and consequently her appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. [26] See Note No. 1, supra. [27] Rollo, p. 32. [28] Id., p. 13. [29] Id., p. 14. [30] People v. Medina, 292 SCRA 436 [1998]. [31] People v. Yabut, 316 SCRA 237, 249 [1999] citing People v. Guevarra, 306 SCRA 111 [1999]. [32] Rollo, p. 28. [33] People v. Hernandez, 304 SCRA 186, 195 [1999]. [34] TSN, October 23, 1990, pp. 26, 33. [35] People v. Ong, G.R. No. 119594, January 18, 2000. [36] 267 SCRA 581[1997]. [37] Id., pp. 595-596 (Underscoring supplied). [38] 291 SCRA 715 [1998]. [39] Art. 65. Rule in cases in which the penalty is not composed of three periods. In cases in which the penalty prescribed by law is not composed of three periods, the courts shall apply the rules contained in the foregoing articles, dividing into three equal portions of time included in the penalty prescribed, and forming one period of each of the three portions. [40] Art. 64. Rules for the application of penalties which contain three periods. In cases in which the penalties prescribed by law contain three periods, whether it be a single divisible penalty or composed of three different penalties, each one of which forms a period in accordance with the provisions of Article 76 and 77, the courts shall observe for the application of the penalty the following rules according to whether there are or are no mitigating or aggravating circumstances: