04/02/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly National Cultural Communities, October 9, 1997, XIV-2. [128] Sections 7 (b) and Section 57, R.A. 8371. [129] 40 Phil. 1017 (1909), 215 US 16, 54 L Ed 72. [130] Ibid. The facts of the case were discussed in Fianza vs. Reavies, (7 Phil. 610 [1909]) thus: Jose Fianza, et al., members of the Igorot tribe, claimed that he and his predecessors had, for more than fifty years prior to 1901, possessed a certain parcel of mineral land on which were found two gold mines. The same parcel of land was also claimed by an American, J.F. Reavies, who entered the land in 1901 and proceeded to locate mining claims according to the mining laws of the United States. The Philippine Supreme Court held that Fianza, et al. were the rightful owners of the mineral lands pursuant to Section 45 of the Philippine Bill of 1902 which in sum states that where a person have held or worked on their mining claims for a period equivalent to ten years, evidence of such possession and working of the claims for such period shall be sufficient to establish a right to a patent thereto. On appeal, the United States Supreme Court affirmed the decision of the Philippine Supreme Court and held that the indigenous peoples were the rightful owners of the contested parcel of land, stating that the possession and working by Fianza, et al. of the mining claim in the Philippine Islands for the time required under the Section 45 of the Philippine Bill of 1902 to establish the right to a patent, need not have been under a claim of title. [131] Memorandum of Intervenors Flavier, et al., Rollo, p. 918. [132] Article I of the Decree of Superior Civil Government of January 29, 1864 provided that "The supreme ownership of mines throughout the kingdom belong to the crown and the king. They shall not be exploited except by persons who obtained special grant from this superior government and by those who may secure it thereafter, subject to this regulation." (FRANCISCO, PHILIPPINE LAWS ON NATURAL RESOURCES, 2nd ed. [1956], p. 14, citing the unpublished case of Lawrence v. Garduno, G.R. No. 19042.) Article 2 of the Royal Decree of May 14, 1867 (the Spanish Mining Law), the law in force at the time of the cession of the Philippines to the United States contained a similar declaration, thus: The ownership of the substances enumerated in the preceding article (among them those of inflammable nature) belongs to the state, and they cannot be disposed of without an authorization issued by the Superior Civil Governor. The Spanish Civil Code contained the following analogous provisions affirming the State's ownership over minerals: Art. 339. Property of public dominium is-xxx elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/36882 121/148