Corporation the amount awarded therein to respondent Mohmina Macaraya. This Decision is immediately executory. No costs. SO ORDERED. Narvasa, C.J., (Chairman), Kapunan, and Purisima, JJ., concur. i[1] Rollo, pp. 40-47. ii[2] Docketted as POEA Case No. (L) 90-05-551. iii[3] Rollo, pp. 46-47. iv[4] Ibid., pp. 54-55. v[5] Id., pp. 24-32. vi[6] Id., p. 33. vii[7] Infra. viii[8] Petitioners appeal was originally dismised for late-filing by the NLRC on September 14, 1993, but was reconsidered upon a finding that the appeal was filed by registered mail. ix[9] 206 SCRA 127 (1992). x[10] In Icasiano v. Office of the President, 209 SCRA 25 (1992), the Court held that the NLRC could not have a clear-cut basis for its ruling that the petitioner should be dismissed from employment as it did not set out its findings of facts upon which it could base its decision. xi[11] Nicos, supra., at p. 134. xii[12] 173 SCRA 324 (1989). xiii[13] Rule I (b) and (c), Book I. xiv[14] Rule II (gg), Book I, xv[15] Sec. 1, Rule I, Book III. xvi[16] Ibid., Sec. 5. xvii[17] Sec. 10, Rule 6 provides as follows: Answer to counterclaim or cross-claim required.- A counterclaim or cross-claim must be answered, and failure to do so will constitute a default under Rule 18. The party filing