•
Decision
- 10 -
G.R. No. 227363
rape gender-free, Mr. Damasing asked how carnal knowledge could be
committed in case the sexual act involved persons of the same sex or
involves unconventional sexual acts.
Mr. [Sergio A. F.] Apostol replied that the Bill is divided into two
classifications: rape and sexual assault. The Committee, he explained,
defines rape as carnal knowledge by a person with the opposite sex, while
sexual assault is defined as gender-free, meaning it is immaterial whether
the person committing the sexual act is a man or a woman or of the same
sex as the victim.
Sl:lbsequently, Mr. Damasing adverted to Section 1 which seeks to
amend Article 335 of the Revised Penal Code as amended by RA No.
7659, which is amended in the Bill as follows: "Rape is committed by
having carnal knowledge of a person of the opposite sex under the
following circumstances." He then inquired whether it is the Committee's
intent to make rape gender-free, either by a man against a woman, by a
woman against a man, by man against a man, or by a woman against a
woman. He then pointed out that the Committee's proposed amendment is
vague as presented in the Bill, unlike the Senate version which specifically
defines in what instances the crime of rape can be committed by a man or
by the opposite sex.
Mr. Apostol replied that under the Bill "carnal knowledge"
presupposes that the offender is of the opposite sex as the victim. If they
are of the same sex, as what Mr. Damasing has specifically illustrated,
such act cannot be considered rape - it is sexual assault.
Mr. Damasing, at this point, explained that the Committee's
definition of carnal knowledge should be specific since the phrase "be a
person of the opposite sex" connotes that carnal knowledge can be
committed by a person, who can be either a man or a woman and hence
not necessarily of the opposite sex but may be of the same sex.
Mr. Apostol pointed out that the measure explicitly used the phrase
''carnal knowledge of a person of the opposite sex" to define that the
abuser and the victim are of the opposite sex; a man cannot commit rape
against another man or a woman against another woman. He pointed out
that the Senate version uses the phrase carnal knowledge with a woman".
While he acknowledged Mr. Apostol's points, Mr. Damasing
reiterated that the specific provisions need to be clarified further to avoid
confusion, since, earlier in the interpellation Mr. Apostol admitted that
being gender-free, rape can be committed under four situations or by
persons of the same sex. Whereupon, Mr. Damasing read the specific
provisions of the Senate version of the measure.
In his rejoinder, Mr. Apostol reiterated his previous contention that
the Bill has provided for specific and distinct definitions regarding rape
and sexual assault to differentiate that rape cannot be totally gender-free as
it must be committed by a person against someone of the opposite sex.
With regard to Mr. Damasing's query on criminal sexual acts
involving persons of the same sex, Mr. Apostol replied that Section 2,
~