Transportation and Travel Expense, Subsistence and Living Quarters.  It does not provide for the payment of 13th month pay.  The Contract of Employment,[22] which is the standard employment contract of the POEA, likewise does not provide for the payment of 13th month pay.            In Coyoca v. NLRC which involves a claim for separation pay, this Court held:            Furthermore, petitioner’s contract did not provide for separation benefits.  In this connection, it is important to note that neither does POEA standard employment contract for Filipino seamen provide for such benefits.               As a Filipino seaman, petitioner is governed by the Rules and Regulations Governing Overseas Employment and the said Rules do not provide for separation or termination pay.  x x x[23]             Hence, in the absence of any provision in his Contract governing the payment of 13th month pay, Tanchico is not entitled to the benefit.   On Disability Benefits            Petitioners allege that Tanchico’s Contract ended on 13 October 1992 when he returned to Manila.  They allege that the vacation period is not part of the period of employment.             We cannot accept petitioners’ contention.            The duration of the Contract was for eight months.  The Contract also provides:   Article V VACATIONS               Vacation days shall be earned at the rate of seven and one-half days (7.5) days for each thirty (30) days of continuous service, calculated from date of departure from Manila and until date of return to Manila.  Vacation begins on the day following arrival in Manila.