Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 3rd edition (2006) Indicators 1. Basic information on PAP households 2. Restoration of living standards 3. Restoration of Livelihoods 4. Levels PAP Satisfaction of 5. Effectiveness of Resettlement Planning ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ ‰ Location Composition and structures, ages, education and skill levels Gender of household head Ethnic group Access to health, education, utilities and other social services Housing type Land use and other resource ownership and patterns Occupation and employment patterns Income sources and levels Agricultural production data (for rural households) Participation in neighborhood or community groups Access to cultural sites and events Value of all assets forming entitlements and resettlement entitlements Were house compensation payments made free of depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the PPAP? ‰ Have PAFs adopted the housing options developed? ‰ Have perceptions of “community” been restored ‰ Have PAFs achieved replacement of key social cultural elements? ‰ Have affected IP communities at least maintained their living standards prior to the project? ‰ Have proper measures been undertaken to protect their customs, indigenous structures? ‰ Were compensation payments free of deduction for depreciation, fees or transfer costs to the PPAP? ‰ Were compensation payments sufficient to replace lost assets? ‰ Was sufficient replacement land available of suitable standard? ‰ Did transfer and relocation payments cover these costs? ‰ Did income substitution allow for re-establishment of enterprises and production? ‰ Have enterprises affected received sufficient assistance to re-establish themselves? ‰ Have vulnerable groups been provided income-earning opportunities? Are these effective and sustainable? ‰ Do jobs provided restore pre-project income levels and living standards? ‰ How much do AFs know about resettlement procedures and entitlements? Do PAFs know their entitlements? ‰ Do they know if these have been met? ‰ How do PAFs assess the extent to which their own living standards and livelihood been restored? ‰ How much do PAFs know about grievance procedures and conflict resolution procedures? How satisfied are those who have used said mechanism? ‰ How much do the affected IP communities know about the IP framework in the LARRIPP? ‰ Do they know their rights under the IP framework? ‰ How much do they know about the grievance procedures available to them? ‰ Do they know how to access to it? ‰ How do they assess the implementation of the MOA and the IPAPs? ‰ Were the PAFs and their assets correctly enumerated? ‰ Was any land speculators assisted? ‰ Was the time frame and budget sufficient to meet objectives? ‰ Were entitlements too generous? Environmental and Social Services Office Department of Public Works and Highways March 2006, Revised October 2006 46