Table 3. Accomplishments in asset reform by sector vs total scope, as of 2017-2018. Program/Indicator Unit used Accomplished (a) Total scope (b) Accomplishment as percent of total scope (a/b) x 100 o Lands redistributed as percentage of total CARP target scope Area (ha) 4,790,234 5,351,365 90% o Lands redistributed as percentage of total “CARP-able” lands Area (ha) 4,790,234 6.3 million (est) (1) 76% o Percentage of tenanted agricultural lands under formal leasehold contracts Area (ha) 1.8 million No data available n.a. o A&D lands awarded/ issued under patents, as percentage of CARP program targets Area (ha) 2,538,219 2,502,000 101.4% o Non-A&D lands covered under ISF/ CBFM agreements, as percentage of CARP program targets Area (ha) 1,335,999 1,269,411 105.2% o Non-A&D lands under ISF/CBFM agreements, as percentage of all classified forests under tenure Area (ha) 1,615,598 (2017) 3,007,453 (2017) (2) 53.7% Area (ha) 5,413,773 (2018) no data available n.a. No of persons (men & women) 1,206,026 no data available n.a. o Percentage of coastal LGUs with completed delineation of municipal waters No. of LGUs 67 928 coastal municipalities 7.2% o Percentage of municipal fishing households benefiting from the establishment of fisherfolk settlements No. of households 0 1.93 million municipal fishers 0% CARP in private lands (DAR) CARP in public lands (DENR) Ancestral domains (NCIP) o Percentage of ancestral lands and waters covered by CADTs o No. of indigenous peoples in CADTawarded areas, as percentage of total IP population Municipal waters (LGUs/BFAR) Source: The table data on accomplishments and program scopes are drawn from Chapters 3, 4, 5, and 6, unless otherwise indicated. Notes: (1) (2) 24 “CARP-able” lands include the balance of undistributed lands, plus lands that should have been covered by CARP, but for which no Notice of Coverage (NOC) has yet been issued. “Classified forests under tenure” refers to all forest resource utilization areas under different types of tenure arrangements (licenses, leases, permits, etc) as listed in the 2016 Philippine Forestry Statistics. As such, it does not include mining areas, tenured areas (e.g. PACBARMA) within protected areas, ancestral domains (CADC/CADT areas) and others. Status of Land and Resource Tenure Reform in the Philippines 2018