6/7/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly disability as may be warranted by the degree of actual loss or impairment of physical or mental functions as determined by the System. x x x x (Emphasis supplied) [75] (June 1,1987). [76] See rollo, p. 250. [77] Section 20(A) (4) of the 2010 POEA-SEC reads: "4. Those illnesses not listed in Section 32 of this Contract are disputably presumed as work-related." [78] Doehle-Philman Manning Agency, Inc. v. Haro, G.R. No. 206522, April 18, 2016, 790 SCRA 41, 52. [79] < https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/prostatitis/symptomscauses/syc-20355766 > (visited October 26, 2017). [80] < http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/cystitis/basics/definition/con20024076 > (visited October 26, 2017). [81] < https://www.urology health.org/urologic-conditions/benign-prostatichyperplasia-(bph) > (visited October 26, 2017). [82] < https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/benign-prostatichyperplasia/basics/definition/con-20030812 > (visited October 26, 2017). [83] Supra note 60, at 53. [84] Gabunas, Sr. v. Scanmar Maritime Services, Inc., 653 Phil. 457, 468 (2010). [85] Status Maritime Corporation v. Spouses Delalamon, 740 Phil. 175, 197 (2014). [86] See Ayungo v. Beamko Shipmanagement Corporation, 728 Phil. 245, 255 (2014). [87] See Ace Navigation Company v. Garcia, 760 Phil. 924, 936 (2015). Source: Supreme Court E-Library This page was dynamically generated by the E-Library Content Management System (E-LibCMS) elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/63721 13/13