Humanitarian assistance is mostly
coming from DSWD Humanitarian
assistance is provided by the DSWD
and DOH. Those IDPs with or
without DAFAC were given food
and non-food assistance,
scheduled once a week.
Resource distributions were unequal in all
of the ECs. Resulting to some camps not
having enough resources compare to
other camps.
Humanitarian
Assistance The available health assistance
comes directly from the barangay
health workers. There were
medical missions by various I/NGOs
Private donors were also sending
food and non-food assistance.
Security
Peaceful CoExistence
Camp
Administration
Security
For camps that are near the
conflict zone, IDPs are well aware
of the necessity of safety and
security measures being employed
in the EC.
There were various systems
established for having peaceful
coexistence within the camps.
Initiatives coming from the IDPs
themselves, camp leaders and
managers, local government units,
up to the highest level of authority
– the local police.
Some ECs have strict policy
implementation for coming in and
out of the camp. There were
stationed police outside the EC.
There were visible government
authorities in the camps.
There were daily and weekly
meetings and updates in the ICS.
Information
Dissemination
Site Planning
Most of the camps do not have
information on the policy of safety and
security inside the camps.
There were no systematic pre-emptive
programs provide in addressing internal
conflicts. Some, camp managers that were
interviewed state that they don’t know
have knowledge on the protocols if
conflict between IDPs arise.
There were arbitrary camp
implementations and administrations.
Some EC do not have assigned police
personnel outside.
Not all camp managers are aware of the
security protocols in the EC.
There was unclear chain of commands.
Some ECs were well organized and some
are not.
There was no available referral pathway
widely disseminated to the IDPs within the
EC.
Most of the site planning were
conducted by the LGU and DSWD,
one site was donated by the
barangay chairman.
H UMAN R IGHTS A SSESSMENTS :
Human Rights
Assessments
Right to Food
Strengths
Gaps & Challenges
The food the people have is
sufficient and adequate. In quite a
number of instances, food was also
given to non-DAFAC holders.
Due to sudden need to escape the
conflict zone, IDPs were not able to bring
some food for consumption.
Most of the food provided were
culturally sensitive – some were
served in halal.
The same amount of food or relief
supplies are provided to each family,
regardless of the size or number of its
members.
In some ECs the distribution of food is
not regular.
21
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents