04/02/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly [69] 505 U.S. 144 (1992). [70] Id. at 175. [71] Although only one petition is denominated a petition for certiorari, most petitions pray that the MOA-AD be declared unconstitutional/null and void. [72] Vide RULES OF COURT, Rule 65, Secs. 1 and 2. [73] Vide RULES OF COURT, Rule 65, Sec. 3. [74] Tañada v. Angara, 338 Phil. 546, 575 (1997). [75] Entitled DEFINING POLICY AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE FOR GOVERNMENT'S PEACE EFFORTS which reaffirms and reiterates Executive Order No. 125 of September 15, 1993. [76] E.O. No. 3, (2001), Sec. 1. [77] Vide Tañada v. Angara, supra note 74. [78] Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962). [79] Vicente V. Mendoza , JUDICIAL REVIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS 137 (2004). [80] Francisco, Jr. v. The House of Representatives, 460 Phil. 830, 896 (2003). [81] David v. Macapagal-Arroyo, G.R. No. 171396, May 3, 2006, 489 SCRA 160, 223. [82] Kilosbayan, Inc. v. Morato, 320 Phil. 171 (1995). [83] Macasiano v. NHA, G.R. No. 107921, July 1, 1993, 224 SCRA 236. [84] Del Mar v. Phil. Amusement and Gaming Corp., 400 Phil. 307, 328-329 (2000) citing Phil. Constitution Ass'n., Inc. v. Mathay, et al., 124 Phil. 890 (1966). [85] Vide NAACP v. Alabama, 357 U.S. 449 (1958). [86] Francisco, Jr. v. The House of Representatives, supra note 80. [87] Province of Batangas v. Romulo, G.R. No. 152774, May 27, 2004, 429 SCRA 736. [88] Firestone Ceramics, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 372 Phil. 401 (1999) citing Gibson v. Judge Revilla, 180 Phil. 645 (1979). [89] Supra note 81. elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/47263 58/203