21 374 Phil. 867 (1999). Alberto Imperial v. Hon. Court of Appeals and the Republic of the Philippines, 606 Phil. 391 (2009). (Citations omitted) 22 23Id. 24 at 396-397. Id. at 397. 25V.C. Ponce, Company, Inc. v. Municipality of Parañaque and Sampaguita Hills Homeowner's Association, Inc., G.R. No. 178431, November 12, 2012, 685 SCRA 117, 130. 26Hon. Orlando C. Casimiro, in his capacity as Acting Ombudsman; Hon. Rogelio L. Singson, in his capacity as Department of Public Works and Highways Secretary v. Josefino N. Rigor, G.R. No. 206661, December 10, 2014. 27 Id. 28 G.R. No. 183161, December 3, 2014. 29Rollo, 30 pp. 53-54. 630 Phil. 577 (2010). 31Narvasa 32Supra v. Sanchez, Jr., supra, at 582. note 30. 33 569 Phil. 37 (2008). 34 Civil Service Commission v. Nierras, supra, at 43. 35 478 Phil. 1 (2004). Section 56 of the URACCS states that during the period of suspension, respondent shall not be entitled to all money benefits including leave credits. Now Section 51 (c) of the Revised Rules on Administrative Cases in the Civil Service (RRACCS). 36 37 Now Section 48 of the RRACCS. 38 R.A. No. 7877. Canon 7, Rule 7.03 – A lawyer shall not engage in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law, nor shall he, whether in public or private life, behave in scandalous manner to the discredit of the legal profession. 39 40 Now Section 49 (d) of the RRACCS. 41Bureau of Internal Revenue v. Office of the Ombudsman, 430 Phil. 223, 232 (2002).