SYNTHESIS PROPOSED IP RIGHTS OBSERVATORY AND NATIONAL INQUIRY ON IP RIGHTS Yesterday, we tackled “WHAT” and today it is about “HOW”. However base on the presentations it is again ‘what and how’. The idea of having the Pulse IP is the same as the Pulse Asia which is a scanning of all general idea. I am going to synthesis today’s activity into: I. PULSE-IP (Attitudes/Views) MIXED Views about IP Observatory and IP National Inquiry: Resureccion T. Lao  generally, a welcomed idea  overdue  strengthen inter-agency mechanism/collaboration  on various IP concerns  complementation with NCIP – a good partnership but not to duplicate from the work of CHR, enhance partnership with other line agencies  good venue: IPRA assessment, complaint mechanism II. MENU-IP: 14+ What will be the content of the issues and concerns? a. Civil, Political, Economic, Social, Cultural and Development Rights  Free Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC)  Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Protection Plan (ADSDPP) – with special topic on the environment  Non-recognition, grasp of IPRA law  Peace Security-related issues & implications on data gathering  Labor-related issues  Politics ( interference, alliance)  “never born, died and gotten married”: Civil registration/identity b. Community-based monitoring system c. Sustainability III. ELEMENTS/PROCESS a. Clear inquiry framework and Terms of Reference (TOR) – defined roles of all line agencies b. Inclusive/collaborative in actual inquiry 99