SUPPORT 1. Establish MOA with different agencies 2. Sharing of information/data/reports 3. Transparency 4. Sharing of human resources and other resources II. IP National Inquiries The following must be addressed: 14 NCIP THEMATIC CONCERNS 1. Formal recognition of Ancestral Domains (ADs) 2. Control and Management of ADs 3. NCIP capacity to deliver its mandate 4. Destruction of the ecosystems within the ADs 5. Non-compliance and violation of Free, Prior, Informed Consent (FPIC) 6. Pagkawala ng Kultura ng mga Katutubo – Indigenous Peoples (IPs) 7. IP governance is weak 8. Impact of government services not felt 9. Overlapping claims over Ads 10. Di pagkilala ng mga ahensya sa mga IP leaders 11. Displacement f IPs from their ADs 12. Kakulangang sa kaalaman sa karapatan 13. Discrimination of IPs 14. Peace and Security SECURITY GROUP Rapporteur: PCINSP Emmanuel Salvador L. Enriquez, PNP-HRAO Members: Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG) and Philippine National Police (PNP) Comments on IP Rights Observatory 1. To include in the criteria the various points to consider in monitoring the level of collaboration between IP groups and their counterparts such as the NCIP, national government agencies, LGUs and even with other sectors of the larger society, such as but not limited to the ff: a. Number of joint projects fully implemented in the concerned area; b. Number of inter-agency meetings, conferences and other activities; and c. Number of local advisories or policies – recommended and approved jointly. 80