CHALLENGES
ACTION / WAYS FORWARD
Lack of Philippine IP Ethnography (PIPE)
This is not just a census but rather a
deeper survey together with the PSA.
Specific provisions of the Joint
Administrative Order No. 1 2012 (NCIPDAR-DENR) resulting to difficulty of
registration of CADTs with the Land
Registration Authority (LRA)
This is not conflicting but different
interpretations the groups that govern
their respective agencies. There is a
need for reconciliation and
harmonization.
Cases attacking the constitutionality of
IPRA, limiting NCIP jurisdiction over ADrelated disputes (e.g. Supreme Court
Decision, Unduran vs. Aberasturi)
The issue has been brought in the
Office of the President of the
Philippines and DoJ
Political interference in the selection
process of IPMRs
Review of the national guidelines on
IPMRs with DILG
Lack of recognition/appreciation of IP
rights by some Local Government Units
Strengthening and advocating
convergence on ground with LGUs and
local stakeholders
Insufficient knowledge and skills of
Indigenous Peoples Mandatory
Representatives (IPMRs) relative to local
legislative processes
Institutionalize capacity development
of IPMRs through strengthened
collaboration with DILG and other
partners
Making education responsive to the
situation of IPs
We already have the IP Education
(IPEd). In the Cordillera the DepEd is
in partnership with the Council of
Elders to provide context for the
education of IP children.
Unresolved killings of IP Leaders
Collaboration with LGUs, DOJ other
government agencies and CSOs
Unfunded ADSDPPs
Interface with local development plans
-drafting of IP agenda for the new
administration- inclusion in the
National Policy Agenda
Peace and security issues within the
ancestral domains
Active and meaningful participation of
the IPs in peace negotiations
(independent panel for IPs)
30
Select target paragraph3
Connect to a paragraph
Connect to an entity
Disable highlights
Add to table of contents