Highlights of CC Investment Programs of Highly Vulnerable Provinces Local governm ents from the Highly Vulnerable Provinces 4 have m ade good progress in m ainstream ing clim ate change into their AIPs, with PPAs 5 that directly address the threats of clim ate change within their jurisdictions. Of the total AIP expenditures, 29% are tagged as climate change (Figure 13). Of these, most are directed toward CC adaptation (98%), which is similar to the national results for 2016 (Figure 14). Figure 13: Share of Clim ate- and Non-Clim ate-related Investm ents (in Thousand Pesos) CCA     91,801,065.8 0     28.33%   CCM    1,649,354.49     0.51%   Non-­‐climate-­‐ related  PAPs     230,602,130. 75     71.16%   Figure 14: Share of CCA and CCM Investm ents (in Thousand Pesos) CCM     1,649,354.4 9     1.76%   CCA     91,801,065. 80     98.24%                                                                                                                             4 While the intent of the JMV 2015-01 was for the CCET to be implemented by all LGUs in FY2016, the Oversight Agencies chose to focus on the 27 highly vulnerable provinces (HVP) located in 13 regions. The 27 were identified in the READY Project funded by the Asian Development Bank, the Australian Government and the United National Development Program. The disaster risk assessment looked primarily at these threats: flood, storm surge, tsunamis, landslides, ground shaking, ground rupture, liquefaction. Data presented in this section is based on reviewed AIPs for 130 LGUs (22 provinces, 12 cities, and 96 municipalities) in the HVPs with submissions to the Help Desk from August 27, 2015 to February 9, 2016. 5 Programs, projects and activities       32