5/28/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly 615 SCRA 529, 544. [55] Supra note 52, at 244-245. [56] Id. at 244-245. [57] G.R. No. 204076, December 4, 2013; emphases supplied. [58] G.R. No. 192686, November 23, 2011, 661 SCRA 247. [59] Id. at 255; emphasis supplied. [60] CA rollo, p. 104. [61] Id. at 175. [62] See Medical Certificate issued by Dr. Legaspi; rollo, p. 105. [63] 5. Upon sign-off of the seafarer from the vessel for medical treatment, the employer shall bear the full cost of repatriation in the event the seafarer is declared (1) fit for repatriation; or (2) fit to work but the employer is unable to find employment for the seafarer on board his former vessel or another vessel of the employer despite earnest efforts. [64] See Section 3, Article XIII of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. [65] Seagull Maritime Corporation v. Dee, 548 Phil. 660, 671-672 (2007). [66] Canuel v. Magsaysay Maritime Corporation, supra note 48. [67] G.R. No. 201251, June 26, 2013, 700 SCRA 174. [68] G.R. No. 181112, June 29, 2010, 622 SCRA 237. [69] 376 Phil. 738 (1999). [70] 481 Phil. 222 (2004). [71] 516 Phil. 628 (2006). [72] 504 Phil. 564 (2005). [73] 544 Phil. 94 (2007). [74] 576 Phil. 601 (2008). elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/58338 16/18