IV. >> Illustrating the Framework - Indicators for Some Rights >> Putting indicators into context and building country ownership Fig. X Contextualizing indicators STEP I. Structural indicators Identify gaps in domestic law vis-à-vis international human rights law and obligations of State party to human rights treaties; Identify gaps in public policy documentation on the issue under consideration with respect to international best practices; Identify customary practices and domestic institutions seen as being relevant to the implementation of human rights obligations STEP II. Process indicators Process indicators should be  contextually relevant and locally driven; Unlike structural or outcome indicators,  multiple process indicators may be desirable, if feasible; Focus on administrative data for  process indicators; and Devise additional process indicators  and interventions for implementing human rights based on global best practices STEP III. Identify target groups, e.g., minorities, indigenous peoples, women, to articulate specific indicators Refine illustrative indicators for ongoing local programmes contributing to human rights implementation Focus on national and local budgetary processes for mainstreaming human rights Outcome indicators Standard formulations of indicators are universally relevant but may need to be customized to specific target population groups Review / validation of indicators based on the requirement for follow-up to recommendations from human rights mechanisms and country-specific evidence Human Rights Indicators 87