6/9/2020 E-Library - Information At Your Fingertips: Printer Friendly In fact, even at present-day prices, the said amount could already cover plane fare to Europe, the U.S. and back to the Philippines. That the appellant offered to get them a job is clear from the testimony of the witnesses. Nonito Abadillos: "Q A Did you inquire from the accused where you are going to be employed? We asked her and she said Saitama, sir. Q A What kind of work will you do in that place? She said only as factory workers, sir. Q And what are the requirements, if any, did the accused tell you in order that you can be deployed at Saitama, Japan? A Nothing, sir, except she said she will get a passport and to get us tourist visa and once we arrive in Japan, we will be employed as factory workers. Q A Did you agree to her offer that you will be deployed? I agreed, sir, with the agreement that I will be sent to Japan. Q And what is the consideration if any for the services to be rendered by the accused to you? A The P75,000.00, sir."[9] Ricardo Rosita: "FISCAL DAING JR: Q: Aside from what you have stated, when you met for what purpose were you going to pay the amount of P75,000? WITNESS: So that I will be able to work in Japan. Q: A: Who told you you will be able to work to Japan? Susan. Q: When did she tell you that she can send you to Japan to work? A: Before March 13, 1991."[10]and Leandro Rosita: "FISCAL Q A Mr. Witness, how did you come to know the accused? She comes to our house and she was recruiting us. FISCAL Q Where was she recruiting you for? elibrary.judiciary.gov.ph/thebookshelf/showdocsfriendly/1/34852 4/6

Select target paragraph3