Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy, 3rd edition (2006) ‰ How many PAFs opted to donate their lands to the government? ‰ How many landholdings were subjected to quit claim? Easement? ‰ How many PAFs accepted the first offer at zonal valuation? ‰ How many PAFs rejected the first offer and accepted the second offer? ‰ How many PAFs resorted to expropriation? ‰ How many PAF households have received land titles? ‰ How many PAFs have received housing as per relocation options in the RPAP? ‰ Does house quality meet the standards agreed? ‰ Have relocation sites been selected and developed as per agreed standards? ‰ Are the PAFs occupying the new houses? ‰ Are assistance measures being implemented as planned for host communities? ‰ Is restoration proceeding for social infrastructure and services? ‰ Are the PAFs able to access schools, health services, cultural sites and activities at the level of accessibility prior to resettlement? income and livelihood restoration activities being implemented as set out in income restoration Plan? For example utilizing replacement land, commencement of production, numbers of PAFs trained and provided with jobs, micro-credit disbursed, number of income generating activities assisted? ‰ Have affected businesses received entitlements including transfer and payments for net losses resulting from lost business and stoppage of production? ‰ Have consultations taken place as scheduled including meetings, groups, and community activities? Have appropriate resettlement leaflets been prepared and distributed? ‰ How many PAFs know their entitlements? How many know if they have been received? ‰ Have any PAFs used the grievance redress procedures? What were the outcomes? ‰ Have conflicts been resolved? ‰ Was the social preparation phase implemented? ‰ Were separate consultations done for Indigenous Peoples? ‰ Was the conduct of these consultations inter-generationally exclusive, gender fair, free from external coercion and manipulation, done in a manner appropriate to the language and customs of the affected IP community and with proper disclosure? ‰ How was the participation of IP women and children? Were they adequately represented? ‰ What changes have occurred in patterns of occupation, production and resources use compared to the pre-project situation? ‰ What changes have occurred in income and expenditure patterns compared to pre-project situation? What have been the changes in cost of living compared to pre-project situation? Have PAFs’ incomes kept pace with these changes? ‰ What changes have taken place in key social and cultural parameters relating to living standards? ‰ What changes have occurred for vulnerable groups? ‰ Has the situation of ICCs/IPs improved, or at least maintained, as a result of the project? ‰ Are IP women reaping the same benefits as IP men? ‰ Are negative impacts proportionally shared by IP men and women? ‰ Are 3. Public Participation and Consultation 4. Benefit Monitoring 2. FOR THE EMA Basis for Indicators Monitoring Environmental and Social Services Office Department of Public Works and Highways March 2006, Revised October 2006 45