Figure 16: Annual Trend in mCPR (AW) versus the NOH Target unsafe abortions23, and 1,470 maternal deaths were all averted. High Impact Strategies to Reach 2022 NOH Target To reach the NOH target, the National Family Planning Program identified five priority strategies, that based on global evidence, are considered high impact practices in FP and proven to generate better growth in mCPR. These strategies were included in the Program’s Costed Implementation Plan (CIP) for FP 2019-2022. Source: DOH FHSIS and NOH Figure 17: Health Impact of Family Planning In 2019, As a result of contraceptive use, 7.8 million 2.8 million unintended pregnancies prevented women in the Philippines used modern FP methods 669,000 unsafe abortions averted 1,470 maternal deaths averted Source: Core Indicators Calculator,Track20, Avenir Health enhancements in data collection and validation will need to be prioritized to ensure data accuracy and reliability for program planning and decisionmaking. Based on the modeled estimates from the Family Planning Estimation Tool (FPET)22, the mCPR for all women in 2019 is projected at 27.7 percent or around 7.8 million women modern FP users. As a result of contraceptive use in 2019, it is estimated that 2.8 million unintended pregnancies, 669,000 22 FPET is a statistical modeling used by the United Nations Population Division (UNPD) that draws from 194 countries and areas worldwide. FPET was adapted to work with a single country at a time and to accept service statistics as well as survey data to establish trends. It was developed by the Track20 Project (implemented by Avenir Health Inc.) for the FP2020 focus countries. Note that in the previous RPRH Report, the indicator used for abortion is the total estimated abortions in the country which include spontaneous abortions. The FP Goals model was used to strategically select cost-effective interventions among the list of high impact practices in FP. The model estimates the impact of introducing or scaling up various FP interventions in the country’s mCPR based on the change in coverage (from the baseline to the end line) and the odds ratio for the intervention. The higher the odds ratio, the more likely that exposure to the intervention will lead to increase in mCPR. The model combines the demographic data, status of FP programming, and evidence of the effectiveness (odds ratio) of various interventions in FP to help the Program set realistic goals and prioritize investments across the wide range of FP interventions. If all interventions and scale-ups are in place by 2022, the FP Goals estimated a total potential growth in mCPR of around seven percentage-points or an mCPR among all women of 32 percent by 2022. The model is also tailored to the demographic situation in the country and its regions. This means that the impact of an intervention will vary by region. The graph above shows the estimated 23 Note that in the previous RPRH Report, the indicator used for abortion is the total estimated abortions in the country which include spontaneous abortions. 50 50 2019 2019Annual AnnualReport Report Responsible ResponsibleParenthood Parenthoodand andReproductive ReproductiveHealth HealthAct Actofof2012 2012