2. If the victim is under twelve (12) years of age, the nomenclature of the crime should be "Acts of Lasciviousness under Article 336 of the Revised Penal Code in relation to Section 5(b) of R.A. No. 7610." Pursuant to the second proviso in Section 5(b) of R.A. No. 7610, the imposable penalty is reclusion temporal in its medium period. 3. If the victim is exactly twelve (12) years of age, or more than twelve (12) but below eighteen (18) years of age, or is eighteen (18) years old or older but is unable to fully take care of herself/himself or protect herself/himself from abuse, neglect, cruelty, exploitation or discrimination because of a physical or mental disability or condition, the crime should be designated as "Lascivious Conduct under Section 5(b) of R.A. No. 7610," and the imposable penalty is reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua.[54] Accordingly, accused-appellant is hereby found guilty of two counts of lascivious conduct under Article 336 of the RPC, in relation to RA No. 7610, in Criminal Case Nos. 09-1118 and 09-1121. As regards the penalty imposed, the RTC properly imposed the penalty of reclusion perpetua. Under Section 5(b) of RA No. 7610, the imposable penalty for lascivious conduct is reclusion temporal in its medium period to reclusion perpetua since AAA was over 12 but under 18 years of age at the time of the commission of the offense.[55] Considering, however, the attendant circumstance of relationship, the penalty must be applied in its maximum period, which is reclusion perpetua, without eligibility of parole, in accordance with Section 31 (c) of RA No. 7610.[56] However, the damages awarded in Criminal Case Nos. 09-1118 and 09-1121 must be modified in light of recent jurisprudence where the victim is entitled to civil indemnity, moral damages and exemplary damages, for each count, each in the amount of P75,000.00, regardless of the number of qualifying/aggravating circumstances present if the circumstances surrounding the crime call for the imposition of reclusion perpetua.[57] WHEREFORE, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The assailed September 13, 2016 Decision of the Court of Appeals in CA-G.R. CR HC No. 07301 is AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION that in Criminal Case Nos. 09-1118 and 09-1121, accusedappellant is ordered to pay AAA, for each count, the amounts of P75,000.00 as civil indemnity, P75,000.00 as moral damages, and P75,000.00 as exemplary damages, and a fine of P15,000.00, respectively, which shall all earn interest at the rate of 6% per annum from finality of this Decision until fully paid. SO ORDERED.