(1) declaring that the respondents’ act for having severed complainant’s employment, after service of one (1) month founded on unjustifiable grounds and encroaching against the safeguard of fundamental due process and security of tenure clauses as well as for being in contradiction to the well engendered basic policy of the state to grant ample protection to labor, to be illegal. Thus, in effect hereof, on the basis of established jurisprudence and mandate of the law, complainant Nonito Villanos, as a contractual employee, is entitled to be paid of the supposed wages which he could have received throughout the period of employment manifested in the contract, had not because of the unceremonious, abnormal and unlawful act of respondents in having put his employment to an end after about one (1) month services, which entitlement shall be paid jointly and severally by respondents Athena International Manpower Services, Inc., [r]epresented by Lorenza Ching and/or Wei Yu Hsien, 1-11 Hsia Yuan Rd. Tali City, Taichung Country, Taiwan, ROC, [which] specific amount is reflected in paragraph "6" hereof. (2) declaring further that the deductions made by respondent Wei Yu Hsien, from the monthly wage of complainant, to be illegal, since the act is incidental to the unlawful scheme of having terminated complainant’s employment untimely in the guise of inefficiency in the performance of work wrongly assigned to him and in breach of the provisions of the valid contract of employment having been entered into by the parties. For this reason, respondents are hereby jointly and severally directed to remit the exact amount of complainant’s salary withheld, which amount is specifically found in paragraph "6". (3) holding that the imposition of the placement fee of P120,000.00 against complainant as illegal, which in effect making respondent Athena International Manpower Services, Inc., [r]epresented by Lorenza Ching individually to pay complainant the exact amount which is likewise found in paragraph "6" hereof. (4) imposing moral and exemplary damages arising from breach of contract and bad faith of respondents, which shall be paid by respondents in solidum, and which amounts are specifically reflected in paragraph "6". (5) establishing liability upon respondents severally to pay attorney’s fees equivalent to ten percent (10%) of the aggregate amount payable to complainant by respondents. (6) And, specifically ordering respondents to pay complainant the following, as based on the preceding paragraphs: A.) JOINT AND SEVERALLY LIABILITIES OF RESPON-DENTS IN THIS CASE: a.) Supposed wages of the unserved portion of complainant’s duration of employment ….............................. NT$ 348,480.00; (subject to proper future conversion to Philippine Peso) b.) Amount unlawfully deducted from complainant’s monthly wage ................................................. NT$ 11, 114.00; (subject to proper future conversion to Philippine Currency) (c.) Moral damages …………........................ P 50,000.00; d.) Exemplary damages …………………… P 30,000.00; and e.) Attorney’s fees …..……………………. Ten Percent (10%) of the aggregate amount of liabilities of respondents, whether joint or several, or individual liabilities.